Friedrich Nietzsche's On The Genealogy of Morals Essay

Nietzsches Genealogy of Morality - Essay Example From this paper, it is clear that according to Nietzsche (57), morality no longer guides people but there are forced by different legal circumstances to behave in a given way. In this essay, the writer will try to evaluate and analyze the genealogy of morality as noted by Nietzsche (57). Understanding genealogy of morality is a great way for people to look back and gauge where they went wrong in reference to bad ethics and morals in the society. Nietzsche makes an assertion that one becomes forced to admit that legal conditions could be nothing other than means to create larger units of power (Nietzsche 57). He attacks the ideas that morality is selfless, the idea that suffering can be interpreted as rightful punishment to whoever experiences it because it sharpens their thinking on a given subject. He also argues on the conception of free will that involves the idea that agents could act differently from what they did (Nietzsche 57). Free will, even as anchored on the Holy Bible that God gave His people a free will to choose between what is right and wrong, is a big challenge to the society in reference to the decaying morals. The moral decay happens because people no longer adhere to any traditional customs that guide their ethics and morals because they are free to choose and behave any way they want despite societal values. He talks about a privileging of ‘slave values such as humility and devaluation of those such as pride and audacity, and the conception that morality involves obligations with unconditional obligations and that it is universally applicable or binding. Morality should be upheld at all instances, and governments should institute measures that will boost good morality for their citizens.

Poerty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Poerty - Essay Example Because each speaker conveys a personal narrative of love being the main subject, Donne and Blake necessitate to use elements that are naturally felt and are symbolic of certain human characteristics as reflected by the beauty and brilliance of the shining sun whereas the difference between clod and pebble serves to embody the opposing traits of sincerity and conceitedness. Blake’s three-part â€Å"The Clod and the Pebble† opens with â€Å"Love seeketh not itself to please, / Nor for itself hath any care† which is apparently stated by the â€Å"little Clod of Clay† in some rhythm. The clod is personified as one that sings about a selfless kind of love and knows what true love means for it has been innumerably stepped on in life. As the narrator further confesses the clod to have been â€Å"Trodden with the cattle’s feet†, the clod’s filth and humble situation explicates a virtuous character that is trained to deal with hardships so that the knowledge and deed of love becomes the essence of life. To imagine, the clay merely accepts man’s heavy toil and severe actions that are normally difficult to bear as it allows itself to be utilized as base to hold moving feet, dwellings, and transport of everyday. Thus, the clod proceeds with â€Å"But for another gives it ease, / And builds a heaven in hellà ¢â‚¬â„¢s despair† to signify how it sincerely means for love to function on someone else’s sake in generous terms. This is in huge contrast to the attitude of â€Å"Pebble of the brook† that claims â€Å"Love seeketh only Self to please, / To bind another to its delight† for in its evil selfishness, it sees and cares not about welfare of others whose loss would even matter in the fulfillment of self-love. On the other hand, Donne’s â€Å"The Sun Rising† communicates the meaning and significance of love through a speaker who seemingly dares the sun to put his spirit to test as he expresses â€Å"Love, all alike, no season knows nor clime†. As though the might of his love